Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324002: x-window-system-core: please depend on xserver
instead of xserver-xorg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 18:01:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 11:01:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.4.8]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6BB7-0001dH-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:01:17 -0700
Received: from gate.22.kls.lan (vpn1.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.172.1])
by piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7JI1FOv020975
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:01:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.22.1])
by gate.22.kls.lan (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7JI1FO2010352
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:01:15 +0200
Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7JI1FtY030372
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:01:15 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.4/8.13.4) id j7JI1Fa0030370
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:01:15 +0200
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:01:15 +0200
From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: x-window-system-core: please depend on xserver instead of xserver-xorg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: x-window-system-core
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
currently, x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg, which denies
the alternative installation of xserver-xfree86. Is this intentional?
Would it instead be possible to depend on the virtual package xserver
and let users decide if they like to have X.org or XFree86?
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
<delta> talk softly and carry a keen sword
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324002-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 15:06:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 08:06:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es (mail2.elmundo.es) [193.110.128.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EA7h9-0005Iu-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:06:39 -0700
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3EE5E46115; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id ED52317315; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D0AFB17313; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
To: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#324002: x-window-system-core: please depend on xserver instead
of xserver-xorg
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:06:36 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart2702127.87FNpKWd4t";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.488481, version=0.10.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart2702127.87FNpKWd4t
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
El Viernes, 19 de Agosto de 2005 20:01, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe escribi=F3:
> Hello,
>
> currently, x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg, which denies
> the alternative installation of xserver-xfree86. Is this intentional?
> Would it instead be possible to depend on the virtual package xserver
> and let users decide if they like to have X.org or XFree86?
Hello, Mario. Sorry for the delay, I did not noticed your report.
XFree86 or X.Org...that's the question. :-)
Seriously, XFree86 has nothing to do with Debian as far as they keep
their=
=20
license term, that a lot of people found controversial and against Debian=20
=46ree Software Guidelines (http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guideline=
s).=20
See Debian X FAQ in /usr/share/doc/x11-common/FAQ.xhtml (included in the=20
x11-common package, points "What is the story with XFree86's license?" and=
=20
"What are Debian's plans with respect to X.Org and XFree86?".
In short:
Debian will move away from the XFree86 tree as soon as possible after the=20
upcoming stable release due to its license issues.
So I am going to close your bug.
Best regards,
Ender.
=2D-=20
=2D I didn't come here to play poom-bow on the radio. So tomorrow from
5 to 7 you're gonna give yourself a hand, green?
=2D (Supergreen).=20
-- Korben Dallas & DJ Ruby Rhod (The Fifth Element).
=2D-
Debian developer
--nextPart2702127.87FNpKWd4t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDFHX8Ws/EhA1iABsRAo7FAKDjAJHEBbxYXXEajC4wgK4+SEWSewCg7Y5h
TBOkLJ2CQOkitz/qBLcHygc=
=55wE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2702127.87FNpKWd4t--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
