On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:01:03AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > As we're coming up to a release and thus need to close this issue > quickly, could -legal please comment on this issue for completeness? I > would really like comments from the peanut gallery, the cheap seats, the > people who aren't lawyers, the people who are lawyers, whoever.
I'm not sure that this is the _same_ X-Oz license that we've discussed before [0] on -legal. The terminology here is probably confusing. > [3]: > /* > * Copyright 2003 by David H. Dawes. > * Copyright 2003 by X-Oz Technologies. > * All rights reserved. > * > * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a > * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), > * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation > * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, > * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the > * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: > * > * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > * > * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR > * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, > * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL > * THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) OR AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR > * OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, > * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR > * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. > * > * Except as contained in this notice, the name of the copyright holder(s) > * and author(s) shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote > * the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior written > * authorization from the copyright holder(s) and author(s). > * > * Author: David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > */ The above appears to be the standard X.org license, with merely X-Oz and David Dawes as the copyright holders. I don't think -legal has a problem with this license at all. Thanks, Simon [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/02/msg00229.html