Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:25:05 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219550: redraw problems with Xft
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2003 09:30:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 07 03:30:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from i250-006.nv.iinet.net.au (euclid.home) [203.59.250.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AI2wo-00086B-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:30:30 -0600
Received: from erdos.home ([10.0.1.2] helo=erdos)
by euclid.home with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AI2wm-0005xC-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:30:28 +0800
Received: from cameron by erdos with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AI2wl-0001dp-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:30:27 +0800
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:30:27 +0800
From: Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: redraw problems with Xft
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Parenthesis Conspiracy
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4
Severity: normal
With certain fonts and font sizes in Xft mode, xterm draws characters so
that they partially lie in the character cell below; these characters
are subsequently not erased properly, leading to an unsightly display.
This is particularly noticeable with the "_" character in Andale Mono at
large sizes.
This is fixed in the latest upstream xterm; looking at the upstream
changelog I believe the relevant change is patch #180:
make height of TrueType fonts match ascent+descent (patch by
Keith Packard).
That upstream version also makes underlining work with Xft rendering,
which would be nice to have too.
Cheers,
Cameron.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux erdos 2.4.21-cjp-erdos-3 #1 Sun Aug 24 01:18:50 WST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8
Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libexpat1 1.95.6-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.1-8 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.5-3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-13 X Athena widget set library
ii libxft2 2.1.2-4 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxrender1 0.8.3-4 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs [libxpm4] 4.3.0-0pre1v4 X Window System client libraries
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219550-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:25:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 18:25:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-202-72-174-244.wa.westnet.com.au (cp.yi.org)
[202.72.174.244]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldwq-00066y-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:25:08 -0700
Received: by cp.yi.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2463354915; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:25:05 +0800 (WST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:25:05 +0800
From: Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#219550: redraw problems with Xft
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Parenthesis Conspiracy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105+cjp-1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:29:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This is fixed in the latest upstream xterm; looking at the upstream
> > changelog I believe the relevant change is patch #180:
[...]
> The current version of XTerm in Debian testing ("sarge") is XTerm #187
> (2004-04-27).
>=20
> The current version of XTerm in Debian unstable ("sid") is XTerm #190
> (2004-05-25).
>=20
> Can you still reproduce this problem?
Nope. Might as well close it.
Cameron.
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA+H/xl1rlvh2uVnMRAnKuAKDZJ/X9E1VoM7+Jh3u0/5c8FjaS8QCeKPyS
2xrApDmDJJFxF045Xn/FvcQ=
=3NDz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
