Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:33:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233691: 233691 - new xterm (4.3.0-2) fails to show bold
fonts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2004 13:19:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 19 05:19:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cirse.extra.cea.fr [132.166.172.102]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ato4z-00034t-00; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:19:01 -0800
Received: from cincidele.saclay.cea.fr (cincidele.saclay.cea.fr
[132.166.192.111])
by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.12.10/8.12.9/CEAnet-Internet.2.0) with ESMTP
id i1JDIQfR015208
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:18:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: from muguet.saclay.cea.fr (unverified) by cincidele.saclay.cea.fr
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:20:42 +0100
Received: from gaia ([132.166.53.137])
by muguet.saclay.cea.fr (8.12.10/8.12.9/CEAnet-Internet.2.0) with ESMTP
id i1JDIP9t014285;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:18:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from fourmond by gaia with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ato3r-0001nl-00; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:17:51 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: new xterm (4.3.0-2) fails to show bold fonts
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:17:51 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: normal
I updated today to the latest xterm, and I was quite suprised to discover
that my xterm
was lacking bold fonts ! Well, to be more precise, only the shell prompt (zsh
bold) did
change in black color, nothing else... And a return to the stable version
4.1.0-16woody1
does show up the previous behavior. Is that a bug or simply a change in the
configuration ?
The man pages show also no bold anymore. I give you a sample of my .Xresource
file, just
to make sure I didn't do anything stupid in the configuration:
XTerm*color0 : black
XTerm*color1 : red3
XTerm*color2 : rgb:0/60/0
XTerm*color3 : yellow4
XTerm*color4 : blue4
XTerm*color5 : magenta3
XTerm*color6 : DeepSkyBlue4
XTerm*color7 : LemonChiffon2
XTerm*color8 : gray30
XTerm*color9 : red
XTerm*color10 : rgb:10/70/10
XTerm*color11 : yellow2
XTerm*color12 : blue3
XTerm*color13 : magenta
XTerm*color14 : DeepSkyblue3
XTerm*color15 : gray90
XTerm*colorUL : Firebrick
XTerm*colorULMode: on
XTerm*colorBDMode: on
XTerm*colorBD: Black
Thans for considering this !!
Vincent Fourmond
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.0
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.10 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libxaw7 4.3.0-2 X Athena widget set library
ii xlibs 4.3.0-2 X Window System client libraries m
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 233691-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 17:33:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 10:33:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (localhost) [65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkndR-0004fm-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:33:37 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 63DEB68C047; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:33:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:33:36 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#233691: 233691 - new xterm (4.3.0-2) fails to show bold fonts
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2CKPe999o93Mtx0C"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--2CKPe999o93Mtx0C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
retitle 233691 xterm: bold fonts went away
thanks
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 07:15:41PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > Debian Bug report logs - #233691
> > new xterm (4.3.0-2) fails to show bold fonts
> This deals with the following (man xterm):
>=20
> veryBoldColors (class VeryBoldColors)
> Specifies whether to combine video attributes with colors =
spec-
> ified by colorBD, colorBL and colorUL. The resource valu=
e is
> the sum of values for each attribute: 2 for underline, =
4 for
> bold and 8 for blink. The default is ``0.''
>=20
> which was added in Patch #166 - 2002/03/25 - XFree86 4.2.0
>=20
> The user can obtain the desired result by setting the veryBoldColors reso=
urce
> to 4.
Thanks, Thomas!
Closing as due to misconfiguration.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | It's like I have a shotgun in my
Debian GNU/Linux | mouth, I've got my finger on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | trigger, and I like the taste of
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | the gunmetal. -- Robert Downey, Jr.
--2CKPe999o93Mtx0C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkD1bnAACgkQ6kxmHytGonxVEwCfdAMq+hoakfR460zlDdYaKRXJ
7QMAn14XjETpESyzEaYDxiJQpT3cJbHC
=ssS+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2CKPe999o93Mtx0C--
