--- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:22:18PM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > There are several problems... > > 1. I'm not getting "dri enabeled" or "dri disabled". > > If there's no DRI support in the first place, it can't be disabled due > to > problems. > I'm trying to program DRI support into Debian's XF86. I can't find where it's not getting loaded, is this not a bug if there is no errormsg when there is an error?
> > 2. These missing symbols. > > These are harmless messages and this is not a bug. If the module > objects > were unstripped, there'd be symbols in them, but policy says to strip > them, > so they're stripped. > Thank you for clarifying. Why dosen't it say that the mod is still being loaded, I guess that's WW vs EE? > > 3. A general not working of mach64 DRI on sparc. > > This sounds like a feature request. > Odd a request to add a feature that I'm attempting to add. > > I have a Mesa tree that builds in linux, previously there was some > solaris > > only ASM. The DRI tree still has this build problem, so I must use > > another Xserver. The bug here being that the SPARC debian X server is > not > > usefull for this, where the I386 is. > > > > I'm now looking into AGP support, thought I think mach64 cards are > only > > PCI. > > Can you please restate the issue for this particular bug report? > I guess it dosen't however it's information that may help in debuging the problem. > -- > G. Branden Robinson | I'm a firm believer in not > drawing > Debian GNU/Linux | trend lines before you have > data > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | points. > http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Tim Ottinger > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
