On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 06:17:50PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:27:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Okay, I will be patient while you explore this. > > > > Just as a remark to myself and my fellow "debian-x"ers, if it turns out > > the bug is in Xt, this bug should be reassigned to libxt6. > > As far as I can determine, the bug is in the X libraries. Running against > the XFree86 4.3.0 build tree, I can reproduce the bug. Running against > XFree86 4.4.0 I cannot reproduce the bug. This is independent of the > version of xterm, and since it appears to have been fixed in the later > X libraries indicates to me that it should be reassigned to libxt6.
Are you reasonably confident that it's Xt that has been fixed upstream or is that just a guess? I.e., could it be Xlib insteaad? Which way would you bet? It's not a really big deal, but I'm trying to get as much data as possible in case someone else wants to sink their teeth into this. (That might be me, armed with a diff of xf-4_3-branch and xf-4_4_0.) -- G. Branden Robinson | I'm not going to waste my precious Debian GNU/Linux | flash memory with Perl when I can [EMAIL PROTECTED] | do so much more with it. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Joey Hess
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
