On Mon, 10 May 2004, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fabio, should we add this to the -2 TODO? I take non-x86 architecture > > support pretty seriously and would vote +1 on this, myself. It doesn't > > look disruptive or mysterious. > > This looks correct, based upon my work on 4.1/2/3, and as Wookey says, > all ARM is broken without it. At the very least, this patch is > needed, although I may have some other minor changes for ARM PCI > systems in the future.
Ok this patch can go in. sorry if i was a bit late on this taks. Fabio -- <user> fajita: step one <fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. <user> fajita: step two <fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
