On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:28:43AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > Hi Branden, > > I wrote: > One problem with latest XKB bugreports (changes in X 4.3) is that we > do not know if xlibs has to be blamed, or if other apps are modifying > XKB settings. In order to reproduce the reported bugs, I slightly > hacked setxkbmap.c to ignore current server settings. If a -noserver > command-line flag is added (patch attached), we could ask submitters > to run a setxkbmap command and determine if this bug belongs to xlibs. > and you requested a bugreport in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-x-0404/msg00796.html > I would like to read your comments before patching documentation ;)
I'd call the option and local variable "ignoreserver" instead of
"noserver". ("noserver" could lead to thoughts like as "What? I don't
*have* an X server? What am I doing running an X client, then?")
Other than that, I don't see any problems.
Thanks a lot for working on this!
--
G. Branden Robinson | If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux | thinking, they'll love you; but if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hate you. -- Don Marquis
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
