Your message dated Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:47:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#243302: xfree86-common: comments in XF86Config-4 will not
be ignored
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 10:20:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 12 03:20:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.unet.univie.ac.at [131.130.221.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCyYZ-0000Dz-00; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:20:47 -0700
X-Spam-Flags: <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>[213.47.57.154:chello213047057154.26.11.univie.teleweb.at]<wanderer.karanet.at>
Received: from Wanderer (chello213047057154.26.11.univie.teleweb.at
[213.47.57.154])
by imap.unet.univie.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CAKJjV079176
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:20:37 +0200
Received: from leonard by Wanderer with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BCyY7-0001L2-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:20:19 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:20:19 +0200
From: Leonard Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86-common: comments in XF86Config-4 will not be ignored
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Leonard Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.56
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Leonard Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: imap 4241; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0-7
Severity: minor
The server does not ignore lines starting with # in the config
file. The manpage doesn't say that it should, so maybe it is
not a bug and should be put on the wishlist instead.
(If lines with # are not meant to be ignored, the default
config-file should not contain comments in this style.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8
Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.21 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.8.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
-- debconf information:
xfree86-common/experimental_packages:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 243302-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2004 20:47:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 13 13:47:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BDUp5-0004xo-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:47:59 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CFFA8642F1; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:47:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:47:58 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#243302: xfree86-common: comments in XF86Config-4 will not be
ignored
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="finhkSr2yyrWw3ow"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--finhkSr2yyrWw3ow
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:24:35AM +0200, Leonard Michlmayr wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:58:57PM +0200, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:20, Leonard Michlmayr wrote:
> > >=20
> > > The server does not ignore lines starting with # in the config
> > > file.
> >=20
> > It does here... what does it do with them for you?
>=20
> I'm sorry. Apparently I had been fooled by old log files in
> /var/log/gdm/ while the new are in /var/lib/log/gdm/.
>=20
> There is no bug.
Thanks for following up!
Closing per submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | There is resilient security in
Debian GNU/Linux | openness, and brittle security in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | secrecy.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bruce Schneier
--finhkSr2yyrWw3ow
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkB8Uf4ACgkQ6kxmHytGony3qACfelDMWsO9eJAkjz5zlFIUyFLs
4BcAnRGQyseWvbTRnjEeHKdlI9DF5HCS
=sQDv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--finhkSr2yyrWw3ow--
