On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:54:26AM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:57:24AM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote: > >> Perhaps you can point to a specific example. The only mentions I can > >> recall of copyright changes have been to the Xserver area. > > > Here's a list of the relevant changes I know of to date. > > The context for this appears to be reinforcement of the copyright changes > already made, since there is no change to the notices within the files. > > Rather than argue about it(*) simply asking David Dawes for clarification > would probably get results.
Over the past 2--3 months, I and others have tried asking David Dawes, and Sue from X-Oz Technologies, Inc., for clarification of several issues related to the new licenses used in the XFree86 source distribution, and these efforts have failed. I refer you to the archives of the xorg_foundation[1] and debian-legal[2] lists for an accounting of the above. Given that, it seems less mutually aggravating to stop asking questions that cannot or will not be answered. Hand-wringing over why that is the case seems pointless. [1] http://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_archive.tpl?listname=xorg_foundation [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/ -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | De minimis non curat lex. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
