On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 06:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > >... > > > > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which > > > > I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be > > > > because of the new sppc upload, making it a transitive problem. > > > > > > Please don't forget to upgrade the bug again later. > > > > > > Downgrading RC bugs for getting a package into testing sometimes has the > > > effect that the then non-RC bug gets forgotten later [1]. > > > > I downgraded it because it is NOT A VALID RC BUG IN THE FIRST PLACE. > > I'd say a bug in a library that causes segfaults in programs is a good > candidate for being RC.
There was little point holding up 4.3.0's progress into sarge because of it; the exact same bug is present in XFree86 4.2.1, already in sarge. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libx11-6 -- G. Branden Robinson | The more ridiculous a belief Debian GNU/Linux | system, the higher the probability [EMAIL PROTECTED] | of its success. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Wayne R. Bartz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
