Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:08:10 -0800 (PST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236265: xfree86 source: 1002 bugs to read, not read.
Applying a patch HOWTO?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 09:32:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 01:32:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-245-10-50.mn.client2.attbi.com (overrun.is-a-geek.org)
[24.245.10.50]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzBhB-0008Or-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 01:32:42 -0800
Received: from cheako by overrun.is-a-geek.org with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AzBhA-0007Hy-UF; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 03:32:40 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfree86 source: 1002 bugs to read, not read. Applying a patch HOWTO?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 03:32:40 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "Reply-To" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=4.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfree86
Severity: wishlist
I would like to start running debians XFree86. However there are some
features I use on a regular basis that I'd need [1]patched in. I put the
patch in ./debian/patches and ran buildpackage. It stoped claming there was
an error applying my patch, there was but I just ignore these things till it
stops gcc. I was wondering what steps are to be taken to properly add
patches too the xfree86 source? It would seam like an awfull task to merge
in the patch and then create another patch, is there a helper app?
The other problem I have is that if I change a file, ohh wait you can't do
that untill you unpack the tar. Ok now I have to repack the tar but by the
time I found this ought my changes where lost. Shoulden't this tar be
unpacked by apt source and then a patch applyied, this patch could contain
your patches and the patching scripts. Just a thought. The problem here is
that it takes forever to repack the tar, unpacking it is not a big deal.
[1] http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/mergedfb-dri.diff
It may turn ought that building all of X will not sute my needs. As I have
allready stoped roling my own kernels since it's just too long of a build.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (980, 'unstable'), (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 236265-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 22:08:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 05 14:08:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web11906.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.190]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzNUN-0006Qt-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:08:15 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [24.245.10.50] by web11906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Mar
2004 14:08:10 PST
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:08:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#236265: xfree86 source: 1002 bugs to read, not read. Applying
a patch HOWTO?
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
That is what I was looking all over the net for. Thankyou.
--- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tag 236265 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:32:40AM -0600, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > Package: xfree86
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I would like to start running debians XFree86. However there are some
> > features I use on a regular basis that I'd need [1]patched in. I put
> the
> > patch in ./debian/patches and ran buildpackage. It stoped claming
> there was
> > an error applying my patch, there was but I just ignore these things
> till it
> > stops gcc. I was wondering what steps are to be taken to properly add
> > patches too the xfree86 source? It would seam like an awfull task to
> merge
> > in the patch and then create another patch, is there a helper app?
> >
> > The other problem I have is that if I change a file, ohh wait you
> can't do
> > that untill you unpack the tar. Ok now I have to repack the tar but
> by the
> > time I found this ought my changes where lost. Shoulden't this tar be
> > unpacked by apt source and then a patch applyied, this patch could
> contain
> > your patches and the patching scripts. Just a thought. The problem
> here is
> > that it takes forever to repack the tar, unpacking it is not a big
> deal.
> >
> > [1]
>
http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/mergedfb-dri.diff
> >
> > It may turn ought that building all of X will not sute my needs. As I
> have
> > allready stoped roling my own kernels since it's just too long of a
> build.
>
> The XFree86 source package uses dbs (Doogie's Build System).
>
> The documentation in /usr/share/doc/dbs should be useful to help you
> understand how to manage patches.
>
> There is also the debian/README file in the source package, of course.
>
> Please let us know if it this suffices.
>
> --
> G. Branden Robinson | Why should I allow that same
> God
> Debian GNU/Linux | to tell me how to raise my
> kids,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | who had to drown His own?
> http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Green Ingersoll
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature name=signature.asc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
