On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:56:02AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > I have been thinking about it too, but that would require other > committers or me to have the checkout of the entire xorg tree (or > almost)
Eh? If I understand you correctly, you're wrong. :) You don't have to have every path affected by a commit checked out to get the parts that affect the parts you *do* have checked out. While I preach the changeset religion, SVN doesn't enforce it. You can check out as small a portion of the repo you like, and updates that affect that portion will be available to you to be pulled down. Updates that don't affect your checkout won't be. > and I think it would increase the possibility of human error in > committing too much in one shot. That's your judgement call, and I'm cool with it. I won't yell at people for botched commit, though, if they revert them (or the parts of them that were wrong) immediately afterwards. http://deadbeast.net/~branden/svn_pres/merging_and_resolving.html > I will try in the next packages to see if it works ok, at the end this > is still a sandbox :) Okay. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | Ambition: an overmastering desire Debian GNU/Linux | to be vilified by enemies while [EMAIL PROTECTED] | living and ridiculed by friends http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | when dead. -- Ambrose Bierce
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
