Your message dated Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:23:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#276400: RFE: lndir should be a separate package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2004 20:49:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 13 13:49:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 66-163-1-120.ip.tor.radiant.net [66.163.1.120]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CHq3y-0000mF-00; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:49:34 -0700
Received: from tea.staff.cccgt.org ([172.17.1.166]:56014 "EHLO tea" ident:
"postfix") by vaogate.cccgt.org with ESMTP id S1503AbUJMUt3 (ORCPT
<rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:29 -0400
Received: by tea (Postfix, from userid 500)
id D217FE1A9; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ambrose Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFE: lndir should be a separate package
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:49:28 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: wishlist
lndir only depends on glibc, and it has uses outside of X. It seems wrong to
download the rest of XFree86-common just to get lndir, if the box is never
going to run X.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-ow1
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages xfree86-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.39 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.10.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
-- debconf information:
xfree86-common/experimental_packages:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 276400-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 13:23:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 18 06:23:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJXUG-0003ei-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:23:45 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1C94A68C044; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:23:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:23:44 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#276400: RFE: lndir should be a separate package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f3n33hPtqmWgzvaY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--f3n33hPtqmWgzvaY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 04:49:28PM -0400, Ambrose Li wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
> Severity: wishlist
>=20
> lndir only depends on glibc, and it has uses outside of X.
Correct.
> It seems wrong to download the rest of XFree86-common just to get lndir,
Read the package description of xfree86-common.
xfree86-common doesn't ship lndir; xutils does.
> if the box is never going to run X.
Please read the package description of xfree86-common.
Closing as due to user confusion.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | Ab abusu ad usum non valet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | consequentia.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--f3n33hPtqmWgzvaY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkFzw98ACgkQ6kxmHytGonywSQCfUMSCKo7EwhJzWPjqTTQaYLl4
XQIAoIkXIki/Gx206Wy2XEzRbl7KdlIP
=pfRu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--f3n33hPtqmWgzvaY--
