N.B.; because Ralf Hildebrandt or his ISP accuses me of being a spammer, I will no longer have anything to do with him in my capacity as a Debian package maintainer.
I urge Mr. Hildebrandt to change his policies or change ISPs. I urge
other Debian Developers to exercise caution when dealing with him.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:31:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.60
Content-Description: Notification
This is the Postfix program at host redwald.deadbeast.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host hauptpostamt.charite.de[193.175.66.220]
said: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [65.26.182.85] blocked using
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net; Dynamic IP Address See:
http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=65.26.182.85 (in reply to RCPT
TO command)
Content-Description: Delivery error report
Reporting-MTA: dns; redwald.deadbeast.net
Arrival-Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:31:22 -0500 (EST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host hauptpostamt.charite.de[193.175.66.220] said:
554 Service unavailable; Client host [65.26.182.85] blocked using
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net; Dynamic IP Address See:
http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=65.26.182.85 (in reply to RCPT
TO command)
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#217605: marked as done (xdm: config script chokes on garbage
in /etc/X11/default-display-manager)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:31:22 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
reopen 217605
thanks
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:33:39AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The bug was reopened due to a virusinfected mail...
No, it wasn't. It was reopened by a message I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please be more careful in the future.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Of two competing theories or
Debian GNU/Linux | explanations, all other things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | being equal, the simpler one is to
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | be preferred. -- Occam's Razor
----- End forwarded message -----
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Free Software Developer | If existence exists,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator?
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
