On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:00, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:11:23PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 07:59, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Why is it *desirable* for libgl1 packages built from DRI CVS to satisfy > > > this dependency? > > > > Because users of those packages would like to build something using > > libGL sometimes. :) > > Do you have a stronger reason than that for me to violate Policy? > > > > > And I can't build libgl-dev packages from there either because GLw is > > > > missing > > > > > > Do you know why it is missing? > > > > It's outside the scope of the DRI project so was deemed a waste of space > > and build time there. > > Well, I'm tempted to say that this is your problem (or, more precisely, > the problem of people who want to both use your DRI CVS snapshots and > build GL-dependent packages). I really do not want to risk people > building against unofficial libGL objects. > > They should probably learn to use debootstrap and chroot for building.
I wasn't talking about building Debian packages, but never mind. I didn't really expect cooperation from you, but I had to try... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
