Your message dated Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#191505: xftcache segfault with match edit rgba=rgb
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2003 10:46:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 01 05:46:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19BBaU-0008Ac-00; Thu, 01 May 2003 05:46:51 -0500
Received: from ice.home (151.24.0.188) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.012)
id 3E954686007B7C01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 1 May 2003 12:46:49
+0200
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:46:39 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bugs Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xftcache segfault with match edit rgba=rgb
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; powerpc-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-6
I'm using powerpc sarge (with an iBook 800), and xftcache broke
when upgrading xfree86 from 4.2.1-3 to 4.2.1-6. I found thah having
(even commented out) the line
match edit rgba=3Drgb;
in /etc/X11/XftConfig cause the segfault.
Removing it all gone ok.
BTW, I'm using libxft2 from sid (get the source, and recompiled), either
2.1-8 and 2.1.1-2
--=20
()_() | Un OS per domarli, Un OS per trovarli, | +----
(=B0.=B0) | Un OS per ghermirli e nel buio incatenarli | +---+
'm m' | Nella terra di Redmond, ove l'ombra cupa scende... | O |
(___) | raffaele punto salmaso presso libero punto it
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 191505-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2003 16:18:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 01 11:17:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A4jfA-00051h-00; Wed, 01 Oct 2003 11:17:16 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0259D64403; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:17:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:17:14 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#191505: xftcache segfault with match edit rgba=rgb
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:17:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:20:24 -0500
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=20
> > I cannot locate any changes to the xftcache or libXft (version 1) code
> > that took place between 4.2.1-3 and 4.2.1-6.
> >=20
> > Can you still reproduce this problem?
> No, it works ok with xfree86 4.2.1-11 and with 4.3.0-0pre1v3 (from
> experimental)
Ah, excellent. Glad to hear it.
Closing as resolved per submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | "There is no gravity in space."
Debian GNU/Linux | "Then how could astronauts walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | around on the Moon?"
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | "Because they wore heavy boots."
--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj96/goACgkQ6kxmHytGonzFhgCdE3KU8088UTe64dF7TCvQhooE
2k0AnRqWUpFa2dQy3kqAwkUbIA8il7dg
=kr0O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nLMor0SRtNCuLS/8--
