Hello! I have a Voodoo 3 2000 AGP using 4.3.0-pre1v1 on a 2.6.0-test4 kernel. While getting issues with tvtime straight (http://tvtime.sf.net) extreme slowiness of my video memory has been noticed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ x11perf -shmput500 x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5 The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40300000 on :0.0 from nikolai Thu Sep 18 12:08:56 2003 Sync time adjustment is 0.0916 msecs. 240 reps @ 22.1760 msec ( 45.1/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 240 reps @ 22.2049 msec ( 45.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 240 reps @ 22.2775 msec ( 44.9/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 240 reps @ 22.3223 msec ( 44.8/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 240 reps @ 22.2703 msec ( 44.9/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 1200 trep @ 22.2502 msec ( 44.9/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square Alas I cannot tell if this was the case under 4.2.1, but I've tested it with 2.4.22 kernel version - the same effect. The same card on 2.4.18 and XFree86 4.1 shows much better results: =+== [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ x11perf -shmput500 | tee /tmp/test x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5 The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40100001 on :0.0 from station Thu Sep 18 11:56:51 2003 Sync time adjustment is 0.2528 msecs. 800 reps @ 7.6494 msec ( 131.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 800 reps @ 7.6627 msec ( 131.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 800 reps @ 7.6665 msec ( 130.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 800 reps @ 7.6610 msec ( 131.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 800 reps @ 7.6539 msec ( 131.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square 4000 trep @ 7.6587 msec ( 131.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square =+== Did I miss some configuration option? What can be the reason? Direct Rendering is enabled according to glxinfo. Thank you. -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
