Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It looks pretty good, except for the fact that it's written in > post-processed format. I also feel that the licensing statement is too > vague; it's probably better to put the manpage under an explicit MIT/X > Consortium-style license.
Ok, the new license is attached (pulled from <URL:http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php> with my name added). To be honest, this is the first one to which I've even added a license. > However, I can't fault the technical content, so with a little massage > from a nitpicky person like me, it should be good for an upstream patch. > > Thanks a lot. If you don't mind me performing that massage I'll see > what I can do. Please perform that massage, as long as you also send me a copy of what you massage it into (I'm still learning this stuff). Thank you. -- Kevin
xkbbell-license
Description: Binary data
pgpWihTfS2dzs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
