Your message dated Wed, 7 May 2003 00:07:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#192229: xfree overwrites new driver with old each upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2003 01:23:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 06 20:23:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.hotu.com) [66.180.133.145]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19DDeB-00043G-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 20:23:03 -0500
Received: (qmail 6748 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 01:20:57 -0000
Received: from elf.hotu.com (HELO hotu.com) (192.168.168.201)
by arnie.hotu.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 01:20:57 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 15:21:53 -1000
From: Tim Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030430
Debian/1.3-5
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xfree overwrites new driver with old each upgrade
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.2.1-6
Each and every time I've upgraded xfree in the last 2 years, my
X breaks. I spend 30-40 minutes reworking my XF86Config-.. and
puzzling over why it has broken, until my memory dimly recalls
that I am using the latest video driver, and this new version of
X has probably come equipped with an old driver. I'm puzzled as
to why and maybe just plumb unlucky but old drivers always seem
to break my system.
Is there some way in which a newer driver can be flagged so that
it doesn't get overwritten by an older driver? Debian package mgmt
does so much other stuff well that this would seem possible (and
should even be the default behaviour?)
Tim Burgess
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 192229-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2003 05:07:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 07 00:07:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19DH96-0003Xs-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 00:07:12 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6996E6417B; Wed, 7 May 2003 00:07:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 00:07:11 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#192229: xfree overwrites new driver with old each upgrade
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Op27XXJsWz80g3oF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:21:53PM -1000, Tim Burgess wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
> Version: 4.2.1-6
>=20
> Each and every time I've upgraded xfree in the last 2 years, my
> X breaks. I spend 30-40 minutes reworking my XF86Config-.. and
> puzzling over why it has broken, until my memory dimly recalls
> that I am using the latest video driver, and this new version of
> X has probably come equipped with an old driver. I'm puzzled as
> to why and maybe just plumb unlucky but old drivers always seem
> to break my system.
>=20
> Is there some way in which a newer driver can be flagged so that
> it doesn't get overwritten by an older driver? Debian package mgmt
> does so much other stuff well that this would seem possible (and
> should even be the default behaviour?)
You're probably interested in dpkg-divert(8).
I am closing this bug because the package is operating as intended by
the packaging system.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj64lH8ACgkQ6kxmHytGonzyJQCfYU2p1FBDLF1C1tXRtx7aoiIe
SNAAnAp1O8r3nEE7cGpfI7RP+55/S64b
=rVrM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF--
