On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 04:42:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > at least on the mips(el) end things can't be that bad. I'm running 4.3.0 > > for months now. > > Have you ever considered porting work? It rocks! :) I know ;)
> > > I can do most everything but the porting. If anyone wants to port to any > > > of the architectures listed above, *please* contact me. The Debian diffs > > > most likely won't enter 4.3; myself and Mike Harris sat down and decided > > > which patches to submit upstream, and submitted them, before 4.3.0. A > > > few got submitted, a few got rejected, that's how it goes. > > It's kind of hard for porters to: > > - know about the issues at all if you don't contact > > debian-<arch>@lists.debian.org > > The last 4 times I tried debian-ports, it got crossassassinated. I gave > up after that. Well, that's why I wrote debian-<arch>@. You can easily address only the ports that are still not being handeld. It helps porters who don't follow debian-x. > > > - decide if they should spend time on your 4.3.0 packages if it's not > > clear what Branden will do in this regard. Will he pick up your > > packages or will he start from his current 4.2.1 packages? > > Branden and I are already working actively on merging our trees in a > Subversion repository > (http://deadbeast.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xfree86). Great! I'll build packages for mips once they pop up at the X strike force. -- Guido
pgpKBZj6QVDGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
