Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:11:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2003 22:59:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 26 16:59:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 208-186-55-240.nrp3feld.roc.ny.frontiernet.net
(phoenix.overdue.ddts.net) [208.186.55.240] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18oAWV-00067Q-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:59:36 -0600
Received: by phoenix.overdue.ddts.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id E1DE973044; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:59:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lazarus Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xterm: MORE!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:59:29 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xterm
Severity: normal
Screenfuls! Here is the tail end.
Preparing to replace xfonts-75dpi 4.2.1-5 (using
.../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-6_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xfonts-75dpi ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xfonts-base 4.2.1-5 (using
.../xfonts-base_4.2.1-6_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xfonts-base ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xfonts-scalable 4.2.1-5 (using
.../xfonts-scalable_4.2.1-6_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xfonts-scalable ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xfs 4.2.1-5 (using .../archives/xfs_4.2.1-6_i386.deb) ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Unpacking replacement xfs ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xserver-common 4.2.1-5 (using
.../xserver-common_4.2.1-6_i386.deb) ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Unpacking replacement xserver-common ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-5 (using
.../xserver-xfree86_4.2.1-6_i386.deb) ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Unpacking replacement xserver-xfree86 ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Preparing to replace xterm 4.2.1-5 (using .../xterm_4.2.1-6_i386.deb) ...
The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of
the debianutils package.
Unpacking replacement xterm ...
Screenfuls of that!
You've got the info in the previous report, enjoy.
-- System Information
Debian Release: post-3.0(+)
Kernel Version: Linux phoenix 2.4.19 #1 Tue Sep 17 20:34:42 UTC 2002 i586
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182632-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2003 23:11:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 03 17:11:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pz5q-0001YT-00; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:11:34 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5B29764476; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:11:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:11:31 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing this bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I haven't heard anything further from the submitter; I presume a
missing "which" command was an idiosyncrasy of his system.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | One man's theology is another man's
Debian GNU/Linux | belly laugh.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj5j4SIACgkQ6kxmHytGonwBlwCfemVCOjQq6qmqb7xJSOx6ji3o
VUYAmwaL/S84FIm283HHDDYToPtcGIIp
=m/Ay
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
