On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:55:55PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > Weird. Anyway, the test certainly isn't adequate because Option > > > "UseFBDev" doesn't work with generic framebuffer devices like vesafb, > > > OFfb, ... > > > > Could you propose a better test? What will /proc/fb say when someone is > > using a generif framebuffer device like vesafb, OFfb, and so forth? > > > > I can write the string parsing; just tell me what values I need to > > ignore. > > Unfortunately, I don't know the output of all framebuffer devices by > heart either. :) Collecting some user data might be a good idea, but I'm > not sure how to best go about it. > > > Also, I assume that anyone using a generic framebuffer needs to be using > > the "fbdev" XFree86 *driver*, right? > > No, he can use a specific driver for his chipset or another generic > driver like vesafb if applicable.
Uh, so it sounds like you're telling me that /proc/fb is essentially useless for autoconfiguring the X server. 1) /proc/fb reporting something doesn't mean you can just switch on "UseFBDev", because that won't work with "generic [kernel] drivers" 2) people using "generic [kernel] drivers" could use any X server video driver, potentially, so their case works the same as people who aren't using a kernel framebuffer driver at all This is extremely disappointing. It makes successful X server autoconfiguration essentially a crap shoot. -- G. Branden Robinson | Measure with micrometer, Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cut with axe, http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hope like hell.
pgpDo2IqNz8gE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
