Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:56:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing hopelessly vague bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 23:57:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 27 17:57:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18oXuJ-0003e7-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:57:43 -0600
Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
27 Feb 2003 16:57:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml2so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.146]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
27 Feb 2003 16:57:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pimpsvr (h24-80-196-4.gv.shawcable.net [24.80.196.4])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
27 Feb 2003 16:57:41 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:57:51 -0800
From: Daryl Quenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Package: XFree 4.2.1 + Libs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_yncF62VI+q9e0fUU35PRCg)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUPERLONG_LINE,USER_AGENT_OE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_yncF62VI+q9e0fUU35PRCg)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Package: Xfree 4.2.1 + Libs
Version: 4.2.1-6
The other machine is the problem machine so I can't cut and paste quickly. The
problem occurs when startx is run it fails to resolve some issues with the GL
libs. I just upgrade from 4.2.1-5 which was working perfectly fine.
Daryl
--Boundary_(ID_yncF62VI+q9e0fUU35PRCg)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Package: Xfree 4.2.1 + Libs</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Version: 4.2.1-6</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The other machine is the problem machine so I
can't
cut and paste quickly. The problem occurs when startx is run it fails to
resolve some issues with the GL libs. I just upgrade from 4.2.1-5 which
was working perfectly fine.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
Daryl</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
--Boundary_(ID_yncF62VI+q9e0fUU35PRCg)--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182802-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2003 06:56:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 28 00:56:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18oeS1-0002b9-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:56:58 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 72FA664107; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:56:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:56:57 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing hopelessly vague bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Your bug report was far too vague for me to be able to do anything about
it; in fact initially I didn't even get it because it was filed against
a nonexistent Debian package.
"Xfree 4.2.1 + Libs" is not the name of a Debian package.
I suggest getting some assistance from the Debian community before
attempting to re-file.
The primary Debian users' support forum is the debian-user mailing list. Y=
ou
can learn more about this list at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
If you have already tried that mailing list, and/or your machine does *NOT*
use an Intel-x86 compatible CPU (such as a Pentium or AMD Athlon chip), you
may also want to peruse one of Debian's architecture-specific mailing
lists:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-m68k/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/
http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/
Before sending a message to one of the mailing lists, it's wise to try
using the search interface; in many cases, your problem has been
experienced before by other people, and a solution, workaround, or
explanation may already be available!
http://lists.debian.org/search.html
If the search engine turns up nothing, you should know whether or not
you're subscribed to a mailing list before sending a message to it. If you
are not subscribed, make *certain* that you ask for private copies of
replies to your message. Debian's standard practice is to reply only to
mailing lists (this cuts down on Internet traffic and annoying bounce
messages). If you want people to deviate from this standard practice you
should ask them to do so. (Advanced mail users should set a
Mail-Followup-To header that includes both the list address and their own
address.)
Finally, if you have found a problem in Debian's XFree86 packages (and
especially if Debian experts on one or more of the above mailing lists
agree), you should file a bug report with the Debian Bug Tracking System.
One of the best ways to do this is with the "reportbug" package and command
of the same name. One way to install reportbug is with "apt-get"; for
example:
$ apt-get install reportbug
The "reportbug" command has a few different modes that cater to different
levels of user expertise. If this message has contained a lot of jargon
that is unfamiliar to you, you likely want to use reportbug's "novice"
mode; here's one way to do that.
$ reportbug --mode=3Dnovice
Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem,
or type 'other' to report a more general problem.
>
If you're more sophisticated, or if you are not using the released version
of Debian ("stable"), but instead Debian "testing" or "unstable", you
should use reportbug's standard mode.
$ reportbug
Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem,
or type 'other' to report a more general problem.
>
The reportbug command is extensively documented in its usage message and
manual page. Commands to view these pieces of documentation are:
$ reportbug --help | more
$ man reportbug
(The output of the above commands has been omitted from this message.)
Please do *not* send private messages to Debian developers (including me)
asking for help; Debian developers are volunteers, and often busy ones.
Additionally, you're more likely to get a rapid reply if you mail one of
the support lists enumerated above, because that way many people can see
your message instead of just one.
Thanks for using the Debian system!
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If ignorance is bliss,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | is omniscience hell?
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj5fCDkACgkQ6kxmHytGonx7mgCfYng6xzDB98tEHbhqtrRxudZv
Du4AoJxTAY3toWtJZg3bW0LoESlFInx7
=n4r0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TA4f0niHM6tHt3xR--
