On Die, 2002-10-08 at 18:52, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:55:26PM -0400, Ian Bicking wrote: > > Here's the backtrace, tell me if there's anything more you need: > [...] > > #7 0x0807f3c8 in xf86SigHandler (signo=11) at xf86Events.c:1085 > > signo = 11 > > #8 0x4007e518 in sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > No symbol table info available. > > #9 0x40197cdc in ?? () > > No symbol table info available. > > #10 0x0852b478 in ?? () > > No symbol table info available. > > #11 0x0806cabb in InitOutput (pScreenInfo=0x81cbc00, argc=5, > > argv=0xbffffdf4) > > at xf86Init.c:528 > > i = 1075228112 > > j = 0 > > k = 1074540038 > > scr_index = 1074540038 > > No symbol table info available. > > Figures. Died in one of the modules, which are invisible to gdb. > > The only way to nail this down is to use the specially-hacked version of > gdb that understand XFree86 server modules.
Well, you can call LoaderPrintSymbol for each address with a ??, e.g. call LoaderPrintSymbol(0x40197cdc) Beware that the output goes to the server log only. > Unfortunately, Debian's gdb does not contain this hack. Hopefully, the patch will be cleaned up and applied soon; it would certainly make debugging X much easier. PS: I hope the submitter doesn't get this twice? PPS: Quite some additional traffic on the list... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
