On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:16:41AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >>>>> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 04:07:30AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> 
> >> > >> >  I put a patch to build fix on SPARC and new MANIFEST.sparc.
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> > http://people.debian.org/~ishikawa/XFree86/4.2.0-0pre1v3/sparc/101_sparc_ati_without_vgahw.diff
> >> > 
> >> > >> This is a bad patch IMHO.
> >> > 
> >> >  I have a question:
> >> > 
> >> >   Are RADEON and Rage128 supports need on SPARC currently?
> >> >   Some some SPARC workstation/server uses RADEON and/or Rage128?
> >> > 
> >> >  I know some SPARC workstations (e.g Ultra5) use mach64 graphic chip.
> >> >  So, we need mac64 support. We should not drop ati mac64 drivers.
> >> > 
> >> >  But I don't know RADEON or Rage128 graphic borad for SPARC.
> >> >  If RADEON/Rage128 board for SPARC does exist, we need more hack
> >> > to support these (but I don't have the board and enough time to do
> >> > this...).
> 
> >> Well, i guess the Ultra5 have pci slots, so you could imagine putting a
> >> pci radeon or rage128 board in it, is it not ?
> 
>  I believe the firmware on these cards are written in ix86 code, so
> these cards will not run on the SPARC.

Evil, evil boards with closed firmware.

BTW, what about using a apple radeon board, they most assuredly don't
have ix86 firmware, but then maybe all the intialization is done in the
OF driver or whatever.

Friendly,

Sven Luther

Reply via email to