----- Forwarded message from Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XDM and alternatives Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:10:02 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hallo, I have two questions: 1. Why is almost everything using the alternatives-method but not the (K|G|W|X)DM programs (somthing like x-desktop-manager). It's a cool feature and much cleaner than starting up to 4 DM-Scripts at start-up. 2. Why is X startet in almost every runlevel (2,3,4,5). Sometimes I want to go to a multiuser non-X runlevel (also when booting the computer) though thats not possible without removing the Symbolic links from e.g runlevel 2 manually or making them kill-scripts. Hendrik Sattler PS: This is not a complaint but a question for my own understaing of the underlying thoughts of the ways it was done. -- PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org Besucht mich auf meiner Webseite: http://sattler.webhop.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is a Debian GNU/Linux | growing closer. It beats the hell out [EMAIL PROTECTED] | of card games. http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
pgpnzA5zR9Mg7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
