Hi, On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:36 PM Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > ... > That's great news. I hope that this can be extended to other problematic > architectures like mips64el in future. > > > New upstream release fixed the issue see[0]: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gnome-shell&arch=riscv64 > > No, the new upstream release works around the issue, allowing it to be > downgraded from RC. The test suite is run with `--no-suite shell`, > first on mips* and then on all architectures. > Thanks for sharing this. I thought these test cases had passed.:(
> The fact that a package does not FTBFS does not necessarily imply that > its tests pass: sometimes we are forced to disable failing tests because > Debian's policy around release architectures means that the alternative > would be removing GNOME from Debian, which would be a disservice to > our users. Indeed. I will reopen the issue with a non-RC severity. Sorry for the noise. BR, Bo > > smcv
