On 9.1.2020 12.08, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi Timo, > > > yesterday I wrote an email to debian-devel [1], but I think that it's better > to > write you directly because some changes you have done during the last month in > the mesa and libglnd packages have made me crazy in the last hours.
better to use debian-x@ > I have been working with the coin3 [2] package and I found yesterday some > curious situation. I built the package in my pbuilder without > any problem. Then I have tested the ci so: > > - at Jan 8, 2020 3:08 PM I have pushed to salsa and the ci was activated > building the sources but failing _only_ reprotest. [3] > - at Jan 8, 2020 3:08 PM I have pushed a modified version (d/changelog, > d/watch) and the sources doesn't build. > > It seems that some OpenGL test failed, but it was working so I don't > know which package have entered in unstable in that period that could > modified that test. > > That was that I wrote yesterday to debian-devel, however, today, maybe with > sunlight and after updating my local mirror and my pbuilder I found the > error. I > thought that it was because CMake deals with OpenGL with GLVND or something, > but > not. > > coin(3 o 2) is an old package. It entered by Steve M. Robbins > <s...@debian.org> > in 5 Apr 2003. Since some time ago it's maintained by Debian-science and I one > of the maintainers that take care of it. > > As far I can remember we have never changed the OpenGL build dependency stuff. > We relay on the libgl1-mesa-dev and last year I added freeglut3-dev. However, > all began to fail yesterday. I'm not an expert, neither DD, but in buster we > have libOpenGL.so in libglvnd-dev and in sid it's in libopengl-dev. IMHO it's > not a good idea this kind of changes, at least without a transition, or some > kind of warning. But I have to admit that maybe I didn't notice if someone > did it. Looks like libglvnd-dev should indeed depend on libopengl-dev, and it does now in git. > I know that you modified libgl1-mesa-dev as transitional dummy package but, > just > curiosity, did you check all the packages that depends on that package in > build > depends? Because I'm afraid that maybe many of them will fail in a rebuild. No I didn't, there have been some failures but things are more or less fine now. > In coin3, changing libgl1-mesa-dev by libgl-dev + libopengl-dev + libglew-dev > the package is built. But libcoin-dev depends on (libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev) > and I'm not sure if it's the better option. > > Anyway, please, could you recommend me which are the more appropriate > dependencies in my case for the coin3 package or any package that use OpenGL > in > Debian? drop libgl1-mesa-dev from it, since it's transitional and libgl-dev ships gl.pc now. -- t
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
