Hi Leandro, 2017-01-14 11:29 GMT+01:00 Leandro Noferini <lnofe...@cybervalley.org>: > Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> writes: > > > [...] > >> It looks like the system is really slow for the video. > > But really it was very good before the upgrade of kodi.
Do you know which kodi upgrade broke it? Can you revert to a kodi version which does work? > >> I have reinstalled a similar system and playing videos was very slow >> on it, indeed. >> >> The system: >> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo >> processor : 0 >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 28 >> model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz >> stepping : 2 >> microcode : 0x208 >> cpu MHz : 1067.000 >> cache size : 512 KB >> physical id : 0 >> siblings : 2 >> core id : 0 >> cpu cores : 1 >> ... > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 28 > model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D525 @ 1.80GHz > stepping : 10 > microcode : 0x107 > cpu MHz : 1799.931 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 4 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 2 > apicid : 0 > initial apicid : 0 > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 10 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm > constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf eagerfpu pni > dtes64 monitor ds_cpl tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm dtherm > bugs : > bogomips : 3599.86 > clflush size : 64 > cache_alignment : 64 > address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > power management: > > [And the same for other three cores] > >> # lspci -v -s 00:02.1 >> 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, >> 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) >> Subsystem: Fujitsu Technology Solutions Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, >> 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller >> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 >> Memory at f8180000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] >> Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 > > root@pinolino:~# lspci -v -s 00:02.0 > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor > D4xx/D5xx/N4xx/N5xx Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA > controller]) > Subsystem: Intel Corporation Atom Processor D4xx/D5xx/N4xx/N5xx > Integrated Graphics Controller > Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 29 > Memory at e0200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] > I/O ports at 20c0 [size=8] > Memory at d0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] > Memory at e0100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] > [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [disabled] [size=128K] > Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- > Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 > Kernel driver in use: i915 > Kernel modules: i915 > >> I have collected some profiling data by running: >> >> $ perf record -g kodi >> >> Which shows that ~70% of the time is spent in intel's mesa driver: >> >> $ perf report --sort comm,dso | cat > > [...] > > I made the same experiment (consider I am not a technician) and I have > got some datas: do you need these datas? If you have very different results regarding where most time is spent they may be interesting. Cheers, Balint
