Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2016 22:07:39 +0200
with message-id <795ac48f-5616-3783-c39e-dbba5017d...@debian.org>
and subject line gdm has been superseded by gdm3
has caused the Debian Bug report #261150,
regarding default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
261150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xdm,gdm,kdm
Severity: normal
xdm, gdm, and kde all ask the shared/default-x-display-manager at high
priority. Debconf policy is that high priority is for items that don't
have a reasonable default. I think that as long as any of xdm, gdm, or
kdm is the default, that qualifies as a reaonable default display
manager; each of them is usable. If there's some alternatives-style
ranking going on to rank more usable display managers higher and make
them more likely to be the default, that's even better.
Anyway, right now an install of debian with gdm and kdm asks which to
use, even at high priority, and I think that's an unnecessary question
to ask for a high priority install.
--
see shy jo
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.20.11-4+rm
gdm was last released with Debian 6.0 (squeeze) in
February 2011 and removed from Debian sid/unstable in 2011 (see
http://bugs.debian.org/613491 for details on the removal). Since
support for squeeze and squeeze-LTS has now ended, I'm closing all the
remaining bugs reported against this package.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
