Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I don't think that a debdiff is a good enough method of avoiding > regressions > here. You might consider -- and I know this is a bit odd -- doing a build > of the new packaging with the exact version used in the monolithic > package, and doing a full diff between that build and the build from the > monolithic > package. That seems like the best way to avoid configuration regressions.
Followup. I did a debdiff anyway. * New dependencies on libx11-6 and zlib1g * Dropped dependencies on libexpat1, libxp6, libxpm4 * Includes "resize", which is in xutils * programs and manpages in FHS locations rather than /usr/X11R6/* locations. Which is good but requires careful transition work. -- This space intentionally left blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
