On 2014-11-16 09:13, Janusz S. Bien wrote: > Quote/Cytat - Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (nie, 16 lis 2014, >> (I would guess neither nvidia-driver nor xserver-xorg-video-nvidia).
I was right :-) > Although some of them has been installed manually, for the first time > the nvidia packages just appeared after one of (dist?) upgrades. The > first trace of them is from August: > > Mon, Aug 4 2014 16:15:15 +0200 > [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] nvidia-libopencl1:i386 > [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] nvidia-opencl-icd:i386 Something OpenCL related pulled these in - I think we have changed the dependencies since then on the OpenCL parts globally to prevent pulling in bits of the non-free drivers just for getting a libOpenCL.so.1 as some dependency (you can manually select to install the proprietary ones, though). > Can I remove all of the packages listed above? these and glx-diversions and glx-alternative-*, maybe some more :-) If something needs a libopencl1, use ocl-icd-libopencl1 instead of the nvidia one. > I'm still intrigued by the message which I definitely seen on the > console during an upgrade, which was definitely about a nvidia package > and which is not present in /var/apt/log. The problem appeared > immediately after this routine upgrade. Perhaps by my actions I made it > worst, but the primary reason was (is?) somewhere in the system. I don't think any of the debconf messages used by the nvidia driver would have been displayed in your case. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54687871.2080...@debian.org
