Samuel Thibault, le Sun 30 Jun 2013 11:50:05 +0200, a écrit : > Pino Toscano, le Sat 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200, a écrit : > > The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the > > buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI > > support is enabled (and indeed there seems to be only libdrm usage in > > the DRI-related code). > > > > Attached there are patches to fix this: > > I guess we could eventually make an NMU to fix this?
Well, in the meanwhile the source code has changed, and would need to be fixed to be buildable without libdrm, see via_memmgr.c having a lot of unconditional uses of DRM_*. Perhaps we should rather give up with porting openchrome without libdrm, and remove it from hurd's video-all, as proposed in bug 706889? I'll probably make a binNMU in that direction sooner or later. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140208210051.ga14...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
