Alle martedì 13 agosto 2013, Koos Vriezen ha scritto: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:54:32PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Alle martedì 13 agosto 2013, Koos Vriezen ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 03:40:56PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > reassign 719493 xkb-data > > > > forcemerge 677884 719493 > > > > thanks > > > > > > Are you sure that an importand (or is it grave) bug like > > > uninstallable deb file should be merged with a normal bug report? > > > > Surely this is not grave at all not any other kind of release > > critical. Considering this is another case of #677884, merging is > > just the right thing to do. If you want to argue for a > > severity=important for #677884 (or ask for a fix), please followup > > on that bug report. > > I already had rebuilt xkd-data myself because I needed to test this > setup. It's more that I noticed that merged bug reports don't show up > in the appriopriate mailing lists, and thus unnoticed.
I'm not sure which mailing list you are referring to. > #677884 is more or less in a 'who needs it' state. Then followup there and point out the dependency chain different than "install a foreign xorg server"? > Anyhow, maybe I can use this correspondence This is getting off-topic now though; I will reply to you, but for more user-like questions please email us at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org. > to mention another > problem we have with qtbase5-dev in Jessie, it's missing > qplatformmenu.h, qplatformnativeinterface.h and > qplatformintegration.h /usr/include/qt5/QtGui/5.1.0/QtGui/qpa/ for > our product. > Do you have any suggestion how this is handled, e.g. should I file a > br or is this deliberate left out? You want qtbase5-private-dev, since you are asking for such private headers. -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
