On 2013-06-16 18:57 +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: libdrm
> Version: 2.4.45-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> As the subject says, it would make sense to build libdrm-intel1 for x32.
> Currently, the source package is compiling the library but not packaging it.
I suspect the following patch is all it takes?
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index ec12408..873ce22 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
Depends:
libdrm2 (= ${binary:Version}),
- libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386],
+ libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}) [amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
x32],
libdrm-radeon1 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
libdrm-nouveau2 (= ${binary:Version}) [linux-any],
libdrm-omap1 (= ${binary:Version}) [any-arm],
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services --
debugging symbols
Package: libdrm-intel1
Section: libs
-Architecture: amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
+Architecture: amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 x32
Depends:
${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends},
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Description: Userspace interface to intel-specific kernel
DRM services -- runtim
Package: libdrm-intel1-dbg
Section: debug
Priority: extra
-Architecture: amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
+Architecture: amd64 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 x32
Depends:
libdrm-intel1 (= ${binary:Version}),
${misc:Depends},
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehc2c6kj....@turtle.gmx.de
