Samuel Thibault, le Sat 05 Jan 2013 23:52:53 +0100, a écrit : > Michal Suchanek, le Sat 05 Jan 2013 23:44:39 +0100, a écrit : > > On 5 January 2013 23:04, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Michal Suchanek, le Sat 05 Jan 2013 22:47:20 +0100, a écrit : > > >> > there is no VT switch, and pressing ^C 5s later kills the server (while > > >> > we'd want ^C to just go to the server). The resulting Xorg.1.log is > > >> > attached. > > >> > > >> I don't think that an actual VT switch is required > > > > > > From the point of the user, it is. There is no reason why it should not > > > happen just like with other video drivers in the use case at stake. > > > > Those video drivers render graphics. The dummy driver does not. > > But input drivers are still the same. > > > It's not the same case. > > From the user point of view it is: the user simply does not have a > screen to plug to his computer, and does not need any, anway, but the > use case is *exactly* the same: a user sitting in front of his computer, > wants to start an X session.
(and just work with it immediately. Having an actual output or not does not change the matter). Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130105225535.ge5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
