On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:04:42PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> (18/08/2012): > > I just got bit by the lack of multiarch here (wine is broken on amd64 > > if nvidia is involved), and wrote a multiarchification patch before > > realizing there's already one here. It's redundant, except for one > > bit: since an upload is needed anyway > > given the intrusiveness of that patch [libxvmc/multiarch], I'm pretty > sure it's going to be considered too late in the release cycle. I'm > also pretty sure that we (release team) said that already for similar > packages.
It stops a prominent package [wine] from working for a good part of users, so that's quite a motivation. It's your package, your call, of course. > [cc: release team for other opinions.] And theirs. > > you could just as well add the hardening flags (another release goal). > > It's a trivial change, but "git am" is still faster than doing that > > yourself... > > Thanks, but please note that requesting unrelated features in a given > bug report isn't too nice. I wanted to have them in one place, as both are release goals. > BTW, you call it trivial but you lost -Wall… Good point, that's not a case where hardening is really important too... so scratch this part. > Mraw, Hell yeah, mraw! > KiBi. 1KB (the real pre-committee 1024 :p). -- Copyright and patents were never about promoting culture and innovations; from the very start they were legalized bribes to give the king some income and to let businesses get rid of competition. For some history, please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Monopolies_1623 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120818135247.ga13...@angband.pl
