Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:31:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270976: xlibs: doesn't understand IRIX xinerama X servers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2004 10:46:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 03:46:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com (omx2.sgi.com) [192.48.171.19] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C5iuu-0004QN-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:46:08 -0700
Received: from uk-relay.reading.sgi.com (uk-relay.reading.sgi.com 
[144.253.64.2])
        by omx2.sgi.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP 
id i8ABrZNh004038
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 04:53:35 -0700
Received: from scully.reading.sgi.com (scully.reading.sgi.com [144.253.68.71])
        by uk-relay.reading.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA16942
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:46:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by scully.reading.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id 
i8AAk3TF149647
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:46:05 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:46:03 +0100
From: Matt Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040630)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs: doesn't understand IRIX xinerama X servers
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7
Severity: important

 > xclock
Xlib: Did not parse entire setup message: parsed: 848, message: 1600
Error: Can't open display: scully:0.0

My primary display is a dual-head RIIRIX Octane running Xinerama.

xdpyinfo reports:
number of screens:    1

screen #0:
   dimensions:    2560x1024 pixels (728x291 millimeters)
     resolution:    89x89 dots per inch

but each time I try to display an X app from nmy debian machine to the 

irix machine, I get the following:

Xlib: Did not parse entire setup message: parsed: 848, message: 1600
xdpyinfo:  unable to open display "scully:0.0".

The exact same machine running without xinerama works fine with remotely
displayed apps from the same debain machine.. Every other Unix machine
and linux distribution I've tried will display to the xinerama-enabled
IRIX machine with no problems. I can't see why it's failing here (other
than the fact that IRIX uses a slightly different xinerama extension to
many of the other implementations out there, on the basis that Xorg
never formalised it!).

Point is even if the xinerama information returned from the server isn't
completely understood by the X client, it should still setup a connection
and attempt to open a window..

I'm more than willing to run debug if it'll help...

(I tried installing the unstable xlibs too - no change)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii  libice6            4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6           4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6           4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft1            4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6            4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1           4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxp6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxpm4            4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2         4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxt6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap6          4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol-trapping
ii  libxtst6           4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System event recording an
ii  xlibs-data         4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client data

-- no debconf information


-- 
/* Matthew Reynolds          | Secondline IRIX and Linux   *
  * SGI EMEA Customer Support | tel: 087060 SGISGI (744744) *
  * fax: +44 (0)118 925 7823  | web: http://www.sgi.com/    *
  *          I write my .sig in emacs. ^x^s^x^c.            */

NB: Information in this message is SGI confidential. It is
intended solely for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
may not be copied, used, disclosed or distributed to others
without SGI consent. If you are not the intended recipient
please notify me by email or telephone, delete the message
from your system immediately and destroy any printed copies.
So nerr.

** - note that if you send me an executable file attachment,
I won't get it. That means pif|com|exe|bat|scr|vbs and zip!!
This policy has very rarely been proved wrong!!!      - **

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 270976-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 06:31:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 22:31:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DF4pA-0008Ex-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:31:08 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D8BA468C019; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:31:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:31:07 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#270976: xlibs: doesn't understand IRIX xinerama X servers
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5lVNUoiW0yyvItcX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--5lVNUoiW0yyvItcX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:44:29PM +0000, Matt Reynolds wrote:
> Thought I should point out that SGI have logged a bug against their=20
> Xinerama X server and fixed this incompatibility with 6.5.27 onwards.
>=20
> Basically Xsgi with xinerama enabled is telling the client that it has a=
=20
> single screen (logically enough), and then proceeding to pass xscreen=20
> dimensions for the two (or more) physical screens that make up the=20
> logical screen. Hence the overflow of bytes. It's only since Xfree=20
> started checking for unused bytes in this setup message that the problem=
=20
> was noticed.
>=20
> Apologies for pushing this out as a debian/xfree problem when it was=20
> really ours... :(
>=20
> As a more general comment, Xsgi's xinerama extension complies to a=20
> different version of Xorg's standard than the one that most vendors have=
=20
> implemented. It's a bit of a minefield. I've noticed many gnu/linux=20
> packages that don't quite work right with Xsgi.. *sigh*
>=20
> Feel free to close this one down.

Thanks for following up, Matt!

Closing as mistaken report per submitter.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |    I must despise the world which does
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    not know that music is a higher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |    revelation than all wisdom and
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    philosophy. -- Ludwig van Beethoven

--5lVNUoiW0yyvItcX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkJFAasACgkQ6kxmHytGony5oQCdF081ANk1o8rIxxZEE7gv+1eA
SbcAn2aV7OvEDWJ47cbrd12y96czA2rb
=z1cO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5lVNUoiW0yyvItcX--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to