Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> writes:
> Arnaud Fontaine <ar...@debian.org> (13/06/2012): >> Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> writes: >> >> > apparently you changed the -dev package name. That's usually >> > wrong, -dev packages should not be versioned. Please either >> > explain or revert that change. >> >> Unfortunately, all xcb packages have a versioned -dev packages, which >> I agree is wrong. Considering that libxcb-ewmh is only used by a >> single package, I agree that I should have fixed that instead of >> renaming it with a versioned name. Really sorry about that, I will >> revert that change and upload it again. > > Or just fix unagi for now, and “unversion” -dev packages for wheezy+1? > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=unagi&suite=sid > > → BD-Uninstallable for 5 days. Well, Luca blocked xcb-util-wm in NEW waiting for a reply from the release team because the SONAME has been bumped, but he mistakenly accepted unagi. I'm still waiting for xcb-util-wm to be accepted and will upload unagi straightaway. Cheers, -- Arnaud Fontaine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gv5s6z5....@duckcorp.org
