reopen 672644
thanks
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:46:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 21:33:21 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > So it looks like when it's missing, X gets it loaded, but not fast
> > enough to apply to the same session...?
>
> Correct. Closing as not a bug.
Uhh, what? a) we know that users will be screwed and yet we'll declare the
screwage "not a bug"?! b) you didn't notice my earlier message where I found
it's an open bug upstream (with several submitters)?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514214645.ga10...@entuzijast.net
