On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:33:54PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:50:19PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Hi, I'm just curious about the state of Debian support for X.org. > > > > Is it already "complete" and ready to roll into unstable the day sarge > > is released, or do we anticipate some serious effort needed before it > > will be tame enough for Debian? Is there a list of known issues? > > Mostly, it's just getting it built once on the various architectures so > we can see if there are any issues, work out MANIFESTs and .install > files. If port maintainers want to do this (we currently have amd64, > arm [in progress], hppa, i386, ia64 and powerpc), please contact me.
I'm intending to take a whack at it on netbsd-i386 in the fairly near
future. No idea how well it'll work; the sarge release stuff has some
bitrot issues with changes that whacked other changes, and a couple of
things that I'm having trouble figuring out why they're broken.
But since the X.Org build system differs, well, we'll see how it goes,
I guess.
--
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
: :' :
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
