Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296821: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is 
over 50M alone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 21:15:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 13:15:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pa208.myslowice.sdi.tpnet.pl (finwe.eu.org) [213.76.228.208] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D4Q8t-0003Xk-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:03:27 -0800
Received: by finwe.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 678B0389F4; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:06:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:06:06 +0100
From: Jacek Kawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
Organization: Kreatorzy Kreacji Bialej
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: normal

#apt-get install xserver-xfree86

Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
  discover mdetect read-edid libglide2
The following packages will be upgraded:
  xserver-xfree86
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 29 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/50.4MB of archives.
               ~~~~~~
After unpacking 113MB of additional disk space will be used.
                ~~~~~    

50M is about 10x more that 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 was. It seems, that 
modules (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/) are now a lot bigger. Actually
it concerns also modules in xlibmesa-dri - these two together
needs over 200M additional space while upgrading...

bye!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ac12-amd

Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]    1.4.46          Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                    2.3.2.ds1-20    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                  1:3.4.3-9       GCC support library
ii  xserver-common           4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 files and utilities common to all 
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.2-4       compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded

-- 
Jacek Kawa  **...to zycie to tylko taka metafora... [Kaczmarski]**


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296821-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 13:47:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 05:47:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at [193.170.188.104] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D4fot-0007n6-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:47:51 -0800
Received: from mcs3.auto.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.60.104] helo=zion)
        by poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D4foh-0008KR-Tg; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:42 +0100
From: David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org,
 Jacek Kawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296821: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is 
over 50M alone
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:33 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: EDV-Beratung&Service
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-test-SpamScore: --
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thursday 24 February 2005 22:06, Jacek Kawa wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12

[...]

> 50M is about 10x more that 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 was. It seems, that
> modules (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/) are now a lot bigger. Actually
> it concerns also modules in xlibmesa-dri - these two together
> needs over 200M additional space while upgrading...

This was caused by unstripped binaries and was fixed in the bin-NMU of=20
4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1


Regards, David

=2D-=20
=2D hallo... wie gehts heute?
=2D *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
=2D gott sei dank kommunizieren wir =FCber ein septisches medium ;)
 -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to