Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for
i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 12:33:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 04:33:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru [194.190.187.220] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3vhO-0007FT-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:33:03 -0800
Received: from forward.ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru ([10.0.1.2] helo=forward.lab313)
by ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1D3vhH-0002ra-IC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:33:00 +0300
Received: from jk by forward.lab313 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D3vhH-0007gN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:32:55 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibmesa-dri: modules in package are not stripped
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:32:55 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -5.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: normal
Hi!
*.so files in package are not stripped, so size of the package is > 45M.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Versions of packages xlibmesa-dri depends on:
ii xlibmesa-gl 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296586-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 19:15:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 11:15:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4OSF-0003oW-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:15:19 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E90F768C021; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for i386
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
severity 296539 serious
severity 296586 serious
thanks
These bugs were not source-level bugs; they appear to have been artifacts
of the i386 buildd environment. The packages uploaded for other
architectures (at least so far) do not exhibit this problem.
Joshua Kwan has kindly performed a binary-only NMU to resolve these issues.
Changes:
xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium
.
* Binary non-maintainer upload.
* The i386 build of -12 appears to not have been stripped at all, so the
resultant packages are colossal. Rebuild in a clean environment.
Closing these bugs.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | No executive devotes much effort to
Debian GNU/Linux | proving himself wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Laurence J. Peter
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkIeJ8UACgkQ6kxmHytGonxKEwCfWnmvIqexLGNYu2X+dk1s1yU6
EWsAnj/mJabf4q/82UmeEc8UCv40ZgVd
=/L+u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
