On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Drew Parsons wrote: > cc: xcb maintainers: should you keep libxcb-xprint0 ? Do we need to talk > about this? libxcb-xprint0 has no relation (in a packaging sense) to > xprint.
I see no harm providing it. It exists, so we can just let it be. Nothing depends on it I guess, and nothing should ever depends on it, but I don't see any good reason not to build it either. If you really want to hide that Xprint ever existed, maybe that'd be a reason to stop building that package, otherwise, I don't see really any. :) -- Julien Danjou ❱ http://julien.danjou.info
pgpeKdoxeXb6y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
