On Sat Mar 5 21:44:13 2011, k...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Jorgen, > > Jorgen Grahn <grahn+deb...@snipabacken.se> (02/06/2010): > > If you let makedepend generate dependencies for multiple .c files in > > different directories, and two of them do > > [???] > > This bug seems to exist in all makedepends I have tried. I suppose > > it comes from the optimizations mentioned in the manual page. I > > really don't like it, because it will silently generate Makefiles > > with bogus dependency graphs in them for what (to me at least) looks > > like pretty normal source code. Such Makefiles are dangerous -- > > especially when you trust them, because you let the standard tool > > makedepend generate them. > > > > If it cannot be fixed, this bug should be mentioned in the > > makedepend(1) man page. > > wow, a makedepend user. :)
Is there something better for pure Makefiles? I've tried the gcc method according to the Make manual, but was unable to get it to generate *one* file with dependencies (or specifically, append to the Makefile). One dependency file per object file is not acceptable to me. > Feel free to forward that upstream, product xorg, component Other: > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Sorry for being dense -- is that suggestion meant for me, or for the Debian people handling this package? I can certainly do it, if that is the best way. BR, /Jorgen -- // Jörgen Grahn | mot du jour: Been There, Done \X/ <gr...@snipabacken.se> | That
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
