On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:10:08PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > 2) I've confirmed the bug (except I didn't mark it as confirmed)
> 
> That bug was about 1.6, you're using 1.9. How do you know it's the
> same bug?

As you can understand I didn't investigate further, and given the title was
right what happened to me I didn't even read the version.
In either ways, split it instead of contacting me.

> 
> > So I don't see the reason of this mail and please calm down instead
> > of writing such useless emails (apart the fact that _for you_ my bug
> > comment can be useless). If it is useless for you, better silence
> > instead of doing this hurting mail reply.
> 
> Pointing you to a documentation and asking for a bug per person is not
> being calm and useful? You make me sad. :(

Saying "not your bug, no logs" doesn't sound that polite to me. In general,
personal replies to bugs are not polite.

-- 
http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to