Your message dated Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:41:03 +0100
with message-id <20110209134103.gb5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#385575: libgl1-mesa-dri: Is it possible to split up
the package into hardware-specific binaries?
has caused the Debian Bug report #385575,
regarding libgl1-mesa-dri: Is it possible to split up the package into
hardware-specific binaries?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
385575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=385575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1
Severity: wishlist
The libgl1-mesa-dri i/ckages nstalls > 30Mb of files on my system of
which > 90% will never be used ( I only have a i915 card). My guess is
this is true for most other systems.
Is it possible to package it more or less like the
xserver-xorg-video-* packages, so that only the modules that are
actually used need to be installed?
Yours,
Gerrit Jan.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.3mingo
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri depends on:
ii libgl1-mesa-glx 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1 A free implementation of the OpenG
libgl1-mesa-dri recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi again,
Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> (09/06/2010):
> I wouldn't. We don't split the kernel package in tiny bits, I don't
> think it'd be particularly more appropriate to do it for mesa.
I made up my mind: no.
| $ dh_listpackages|wc -l
| 31
It's already a hell, and I see no compelling reasons to make my life
even harder.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
