Sven Joachim writes: > On 2011-01-24 13:03 +0100, Ted Phelps wrote: > > > I'm seeing what I believe is the same issue on my NV40 card (built-in > > graphics on an ASUS M2NPV-VM), and continue to see it even in > > 2.6.38-rc2. I've git bisected and the issue started with kernel git > > revision 72d7c3b: "x86: Use memblock to replace early_res" -- that's > > when the GPU lockup first appeared. > > If so, it's hardly the same issue since the submitter of #608133 uses a > kernel that does not include this commit.
So it is. My apologies. I misread your suggestion that he try 2.6.37-rc7 as the kernel that the original reporter was using. > BTW, is CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM set in your kernel configuration? It is: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y Would it be worth testing with that disabled, do you think? > > After that patch, my dmesg output shows various memory ranges being > > mapped to different locations: > > > > -kernel direct mapping tables up to bfef0000 @ 100000-704000 > > +kernel direct mapping tables up to bfef0000 @ 1f9fc000-20000000 > > ... > > -kernel direct mapping tables up to 130000000 @ 1a31000-23b7000 > > +kernel direct mapping tables up to 130000000 @ bf56a000-bfef0000 > > ... > > - NODE_DATA [0000000100000000 - 0000000100004fff] > > - [ffffea0000000000-ffffea0004bfffff] PMD -> > > [ffff880100200000-ffff880103dfffff] on node 0 > > + NODE_DATA [000000012fffb000 - 000000012fffffff] > > + [ffffea0000000000-ffffea0004bfffff] PMD -> > > [ffff88012c200000-ffff88012fdfffff] on node 0 > > ... > > -PCI-DMA: aperture base @ 20000000 size 65536 KB > > +PCI-DMA: aperture base @ b8000000 size 65536 KB > > > > And this interesting message is no longer present: > > > > -early_res array is doubled to 64 at [16000 - 167ff] > > > > And, finally, the following lines are new post-72d7c3b: > > > > +[drm] nouveau 0000:00:05.0: PFIFO_DMA_PUSHER - Ch 0 > > +[drm] nouveau 0000:00:05.0: GPU lockup - switching to software fbcon > > > > I haven't managed to work out if any of this means anything yet. Any > > guidance, even a suggestion of who to chase, would be greatly > > appreciated. > > Since you have already bisected your problem, reporting it to the people > who signed off 72d7c3b as well as to nouv...@lists.freedesktop.org seems > to be a good idea to me. Thanks, I shall. Thank you for your time. Sorry about the noise. -Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101242337.p0onbusa020...@gnusto.com
