On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 14:51:55 +0000, Blars Blarson wrote:>
> > Several messages from the BTS have been rejected by lists.debian.org due
> > to their size recently. So anyone counting on this mailing list to keep
> > current on bugs should know they are missing out and need to go to the
> > BTS directly.
> >
> That's quite impractical, because of the number of bugs debian-x
> receives. Listmasters, could you bump the size limit for debian-x?
debian-x is currently allowing messages up to 512K, I could bump this
up to 1M, but that's kind of excessive.
> Blars, what's the typical size of the rejected messages?
The two messages that have been rejected are 834K in size.
The real solution is implementing remote attachments in debbugs
(#475768).
Don Armstrong
--
The sheer ponderousness of the panel's opinion [...] refutes its
thesis far more convincingly than anything I might say. The panel's
labored effort to smother the Second Amendment by sheer body weight
has all the grace of a sumo wrestler trying to kill a rattlesnake by
sitting on it---and is just as likely to succeed.
-- Alex Kozinski, Dissenting in Silveira v. Lockyer
(CV-00-00411-WBS p5983-4)
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101013005042.ga20...@rzlab.ucr.edu
